Interpretations & Iterations http://joshuaspohrer.com/blog/ en Copyright 2008 Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:56:07 -0800 http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2ysb5-20051201 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss SFmunicipal FontStruct, Fontshop's free font-building tool. All online and free for download!





The letterforms are based on the flip-disc displays used by some of the older MUNI trains in San Francisco, which follow this simple, asymmetrical grid.



For now, there are two versions, SFmunicipal N and SFmunicipal M. The only difference is that N is gridded while M is filled. I hope to make more versions eventually, but the lowercase and full slate of symbols can be a real headache with my self imposed restrictions. ]]> http://joshuaspohrer.com/blog/2008/07/sfmunicipal_1.html http://joshuaspohrer.com/blog/2008/07/sfmunicipal_1.html Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:56:07 -0800 Another random act of design mess Hotcards' Blog. You can see the original works best over at the Talking Points Memo.
]]> http://joshuaspohrer.com/blog/2008/01/another_random_act_of_design_m.html http://joshuaspohrer.com/blog/2008/01/another_random_act_of_design_m.html Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:53:46 -0800 The Film with Many Names I saw 3:10 to Yuma over a month ago (nothing like striking while the iron is hot) and, though I haven't seen the original, I thought it was fantastic. Mangold doesn't necessarily dazzle with his direction, but he shows enough restraint to let the characters really shine. Ben Foster surprised me as a great villain, Beltrami does his best Morricone impression, and Bale/Crowe carry the movie with great performances.

But this post isn't really about the movie (well, it kinda is), it's about its identity.

Leading up to the release, I wasn't particularly excited for this movie. I figured it would be another simple retread, financed to capitalize on a genre that hasn't received a lot of attention as of late. Recruit some stars and release it during one of the slow parts of the movie season, and the studios don't stand to lose much. I was wrong. They did a great job on the movie–except for keeping anything visually consistent.

This really bothers me because, for a film where it's obvious that people involved were giving great effort, it's equally apparent that nobody gave much care to crafting a cohesive identity for such a strong narrative.

Here's what it all looks like:

Now, I'm not even sure which of these came first. I assume the progression is from top to bottom, but that's just a guess based on the promo site, trailer releases, etc. In my opinion, three drastically different takes is bad enough, though they did use the middle concept considerably more, and I expected the titles of the film to follow one of these threads.

Here's my quick mock up without any degradation:

On my second viewing, I realized the typeface wasn't DIN (as I had recalled) but it is something similar. It's hard to tell with the credits rolling so fast and the all caps.

3:10 to Yuma did moderately well at the box office and received a good amount of praise from critics, but I really think it deserved a better shake for its identity. Frankly, it's just disappointing to see a good movie go without good design. Most great movies have great titles or opening sequences. They indicate to the viewer that this is a special experience and are usually the first step in immersing the audience in that unique world.

For added good measure, I'll leave you with one of the posters for the original 3:10 to Yuma:

(Note: I stole all these images off the web and uploaded them here. If you'd like any of them taken down, just ask.)

]]> http://joshuaspohrer.com/blog/2007/10/the_film_with_many_names.html http://joshuaspohrer.com/blog/2007/10/the_film_with_many_names.html Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:21:16 -0800 Well, you're welcome
So, without further adieu...

...ready...

...set...

*POST*

...

(the internet's kinda anticlimactic)]]> http://joshuaspohrer.com/blog/2007/09/well_youre_welcome.html http://joshuaspohrer.com/blog/2007/09/well_youre_welcome.html Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:27:45 -0800